post your results from the test here: https://politicalcompass.org/

political views are overrated, and only good for a smalltalk with your relatives or strangers, when you are tired of talking about weather.
enjoy your limited amount of fresh air while you can.

DATAMINING THREAD
DO NOT REPLY

Democrats would be slight libertarian and center
Republicans would be extremely authoritarian and right-wing

Anyone who opposes abortion, homo*****uality, bi*****uality, transgenderism, trans*****uality, and BLM is a fascist nazi.

P7767
They are both right-wing.
I'm not taking your stupid test, but I would place myself somewhere in the libertarian-left quadrant. Not too extreme on either axis though.

P7767
Republicans support free speech
Democrats condemn free speech because MUH RACISM

P7775
They are both as bad. Republicans condemn free speech because MUH DEGENERACY
Muhrican politics is a jewke. Well, it's probably the case everywhere

P7752
For me it's high-tech monarchy.
Oh god I can only dream of a future where all the traitors and invaders are methodically externminated through the use of robots that will only obey to the monarch(long live the king).
I can already see the lolbertarians seething. NOOOOOO you can't kill the *****inos that violates the NAP!

P7786
So you're full-on authoritarian. Where would you put yourself on the economical axis?

Individual freedom is the important thing. Groups should be regulated to prevent them from bullying individuals.

[bold: Republicans:] NOOOOOOOO! MUH FREE SPEECH!
[bold: Democrats:] NOOOOOOOO! DATS RACISM!

[bold: Democrats:] NOOOOOOOO! MUH WOMENS RIGHTS!
[bold: Republicans:] NOOOOOOO! DATS MURDER!

[bold: Republicans:] NOOOOOOOO! YOU NEED THE RIGHT PAPERWORK TO ENTER THIS COUNTRY
[bold: Democrats:] NOOOOOOOO! YOU NEED THE RIGHT PAPERWORK TO ENTER THIS COUNTRY

[bold: Republicans:] NOOOOOOOO! YOU DONT OWN YOUR BODY
[bold: Democrats:] NOOOOOOOO! YOU DONT OWN YOUR BODY

P10944 (checked and keked)
nice meme dude

P7797
>Where would you put yourself on the economical axis?
I really don't care, whatever works to make the kingdom great is ok to me as long as it is not something extreme as communism or current year capitalism.
There is an Hitler quote that goes like "The basic feature of our(natsoc germany) economic theory is that we have no theory at all", there is wisdom in those words.
I don't think that government policy should be too focused on economy(materialism), instead it should be focused on the greatness of the kingdom and the wellbeing of the people, if a certain economic policy goes in the way of that then it should be changed without regards of meme ideologies.
Are we at war? Ok then the gov should force companied to contribute to the war effort against the free market.
Are we at peace? Ok then the gov should relax its control and let the free market come up with new ideas.

The problem with giving a government power when a disaster occurs is that they will make a disaster occur then. See literally all the "wars-on-X" the US has been doing for the past half a century. But for the most I do see some wisdom in there. There is no need for economic theories about what to do. Only maybe theories about how things turn out in a free market, but even then the government should be left out of things.

If there is a *****-up, let's consider the causes of the *****-up instead of crying for the government to implement the first policy that comes to mind. Investigate about how that happened. As an example, let's take insulin pricing in the US. Insulin is expensive, way too expensive compared to other countries. But rather than just put a price cap on it. Why don't investigate and see what caused this? Turns out 3 companies outplayed the expiring medical patents by re-patenting them with some additional features. So by revoking the government granted right to be a monopoly on the production of insulin, you can better solve this problem.

But for some reason, people will take any opportunity to shit on free markets, even if in the end their deformations are caused by governmental policy.

P7761
it is a [bold: Bait Post]

[bold: imagine falling 4 the right/left paradign]
in the end both sides want the same thing more taxes, control, and more laws to take away your rights 4 the *****ren & muh security.
natsoc is cringe and antifa is cringe both ran by jews and feds and low iq.

P7752
OP is just a spoiled kike who is upset with his father cuz he didn't get him the latest and greatest to impress people.

Personally I am all for diversity but post time when people use that term its usually some kind of double speak 1984.

P7752
>datamining
Very Talmudic post mossad.

P7752
welp personally am pro freedom 4 small govt and I like everyone including gays, except for da jooos
P7767
does that make me a nazi?

well, not for nothing people call me a commie, tho this is just a quick test, if I would've gotten a leghtier test, i'd be eighter a bit more green or a bit more blue, tho yeah, RSR! RSR! RSR! RSR!

This is my chart that I got from politicalcompass.org. Honestly all of those tests are very close-minded. There are a lot of question where you have to be in support of either big corpo or a strong government, but cannot be against both. In questions such as "should the government restrict the cooperation more, because they are doing bad stuff", you have to side with either the government or big corpo, but can't be against both, so you have to choose what you think is better in that case. This flaw is concurrent through all those tests (8values, supplyvalues, politicalcompass and so on). If there is some Ancom/Post-Left-friendly test out there, tell me so, I will post results then.

P21877
That makes you based.

P21877 based man in a based place

The test didn't really touch on much of my core values [spoiler: (then again, the interests of KHHV autistic BLs have essentially no representation in any political group anywhere, so why would a brief test mention anything related to that?)] but nonetheless here are my results.

P26847
Shit is not accurate i swear

P26847
Holy shit, Yuki is still alive?
I'm Powder btw. Big fan!
Nice to meet you!

> https://politicalcompass.org/
> Vladimir Lenin’s view on UKRAINE was vastly different from Vladimir Putin’s!
AMERIFAGS. *SIGH*
AmeriKKKa: BETTER DEAD THAN RED
Putin: Lenin was completely wrong about UKKKraine.
AmeriKKKa: OMG guys LeNiN said PuTiN is wrong OmG oMg

P26852
thats just the sample image dude you have to scroll down for teh actual result
P66036
theres no way anyone unironically got this unless they were trying to or theyre a catchanner who thinks he should be able to ***** *****

P21880
I did this again
>Economic Left/Right: -5.88
>Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.38
>no photo cuz it didn't werk, lel

so not that far off since last one
>last one
>Economic Left/Right: -5.38
>Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.44

so I have a quite stable overall ideology, lelz

I'm curious about the rest of the fags for what they've got

Economic Left/Right: 5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.62
tbh it doesn't make sense for the test to influence the libertarian/authoritarian axis with answers that are not related to law... I would have got a more libertarian score otherwise

P66038
yes i 1/cc daoni yusu v1 on the x neko how could you tell

P101307
ukraine flag on god fr fr ngl so based tbh

Economic Left/Right: 6.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.62

I kind of expected this, although I find the position on the economic axis too moderate. Well, I guess it's from my disagreement with corporate rule. If we're talking ideals, radical economic right isn't about wanting big corporations, nay, that's what's what the marriage of government and business does. It's about free trade, free markets, and free people. Many disagree with that, and say that total economic freedom would lead to natural monopolies or a strengthened aristocracy, but it isn't the compass' job to make that judgement.

P69769
>same social score
Nice.
>libertarian/authoritarian axis with answers that are not related to law
Probably. It's a fine line, the distinction between law and (what I can only classify as) aesthetics, what sits well with a person. The right-libertarian answer is hard to capture and I think the test panders to left-libertarians in this regard, where the communal spirit takes over private contracts between individual in the regulation of society. Under this test, what is considered "socially libertarian" is different on the economic left and on the economic right, just as much as what is considered "economically right" between socially libertarian and socially authoritarian. Treating these axis as separate was the first mistake.
We can all bitch and moan, so how about an individualist/collectivist vs progressive/conservative axes? These are independent and contradiction free. Any combination can happen easily. For example, being an individualist does not tell if an individual desires some sort of social/technological/scientific progress. Or being a conservative does not imply whether or not what status-quo is individualist or collectivist. The difference between "we have a functioning society, don't touch it" and "restore the glory of the USSR".

Is there an offline version of the quiz?

I find the 2d political plane to be too reductive. I'm not going to pitch a 3d or 4d manifold to address this, I think we really just can't really quantify politics. It is an inherently social and qualitative thing.

Political identity is a group membership. For instance, "laissez-faire capitalism" was coined by the merchant class in the French ancien regime, when they were asked by the king what he can do to help their activities. They replied, "laissez faire", let us do what we do, i.e., don't interfere. Had the king asked any individual merchant, he would have requested a monopoly; since he asked them as a group, they replied with the only thing they could all agree on: the king not entering into their lives as a free variable.

The question of whether you support social or economic control fails to address whether you trust the institutions that would wield that power. I believe in social control, the current state of the west is an irrefutable argument in favor of social control. But I recognize that this result is largely driven by the state's agenda. I know that this existing state's social controls would further degenerate things rather than restore a sane social environment. So I'm an authoritarian without an authority figure, which doesn't neatly fit on the plane.

P101380
>I guess it's from my disagreement with corporate rule.
That could be a like a flaw in the quiz. Corporations are a legal fiction, they lobby the government to manipulate the market in their favor like artificially increasing demand or artificially reducing competition. There is nothing laissez faire or "capitalist" about that.

P101449
>I find the 2d political plane to be too reductive.
If you mean the economic axis you can also look at it in terms of property rights
>every individual is king of his own property and nobody can take it away or tell you what to do with it (Right)
>hoarding private property is selfish and wealth needs to be shared by the community for the "greater good" (Left)

>the question of whether you support social or economic control fails to address whether you trust the institutions that would wield that power.
That's the delusion the auths fall into they always assume that "their guy" will be in charge despite the fact that there is no rational basis for thinking that. Once your enemies seize power then the auth game is suddenly not very fun anymore.

>I know that this existing state's social controls would further degenerate things rather than restore a sane social environment.
You might be interested in a book called Democracy the God that Failed. It's not that we have bad luck and that's why we are cursed with a string of weak, incompetent, corrupt leaders for the passed 100 years. The fundamental nature of democracy means it will [bold: never] produce a good leader.

>So I'm an authoritarian without an authority figure, which doesn't neatly fit on the plane.
The Libertarian-Right is about natural hierarchy with no coercion. The only legitimate way of gaining wealth is by selling goods and services that other people buy voluntarily. Anybody who tries to take wealth through force needs to be removed [spoiler: interpret that however you want]. That's the lib-right ideal where social order is maintained through everybody agreeing to respect everyone else's property rights and the minority who don't either leave or starve or are killed in self defense.

>I recognize that this result is largely driven by the state's agenda
The only reason we get flooded with 70iq *****s is because the state steals 50% of our income and uses it feed and house them. If there was no state they would have no reason for being here. Their choices would be pick up a tool and become a productive part of the economy. Pick up a weapon and get shot in the face by the first person they try to rob. Or ***** off back where they came from. The great thing about voluntary charity is that it only goes to people who deserve it.

I don't understand why.

The real test is figuring out the gay 2d compass is actually a 3d pyramid and you're all ignoring the racial/nature axis above you at the top. The racial singularity,

P118211
Oh, look. Another communist. Which Antifa chapter are you a member of?

While there's time

P118211
>I don't understand why.
The questions are rigged to push everyone to the left
>should the economy be designed to benefit humanity or corporations
Obviously if those are the only 2 options you would choose the first one. It's a complete strawman though, right wing economics is not about designing the economy to benefit corpos it's about not designing the economy at all. The people who actually do the work and buy shit are the ones who should be shaping the economy, not the political class sitting in their armchairs passing arbitrary laws or the banking class printing fake money out of thin air and spending it.

A free market means no taxes no regulations and no inflation. You keep the product of your labor and only you decide how to spend it. That means companies work for you because the only way they can make a profit is by giving you what you want. That's the best way to serve humanity.

But according to the quiz "serving humanity" means giving up all your political and economic power to a group of experts who totally promise to use that money to benefit you and not give it all to israel and refugees.